tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6477941359267770660.post4276950863387391322..comments2023-10-10T05:22:51.727-04:00Comments on The Blanks Slate: No, RBG Is Not Embracing EugenicsJPBhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16468994137056889334noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6477941359267770660.post-31133883749719444342014-09-24T20:01:43.193-04:002014-09-24T20:01:43.193-04:00populations of what, exactly? Could "teenage ...populations of what, exactly? Could "teenage unwed mothers" fit that description? I think so.<br /><br />To believe that she meant 'undesirables' as opposed to 'too many poor people who can't afford to take care of themselves and therefore perpetuate their own poverty' is to ignore the rest of her professional career, jurisprudence, speeches, and writing about the most vulnerable people in society. <br /><br />Doesn't make any sense.JPBhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16468994137056889334noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6477941359267770660.post-81320276339553196942014-09-24T19:49:22.073-04:002014-09-24T19:49:22.073-04:00:/
The views of the pro-choice crowd on the diffe...:/<br /><br />The views of the pro-choice crowd on the different levels of the (non)humanity of the fetus are irrelevant. Many within that crowd do recognize that there's a high chance that the fetus will become a human. Given the recognition of this simple cause-and-effect (which you've omitted), it's pretty easy to see how statements like: <br /><br />"It makes no sense as a national policy to promote birth only among poor people."<br /><br />and <br /><br />"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of."<br /><br />... clearly refer to 'future humans' which clearly are not wanted. Note the eugenic theme here.<br /><br />Although most of the pro-choice crowd do not support eugenics, some do. It doesn't follow that none of them do. You've simply denied the existence of the eugenic crowd as you casually swept them under the friendly rug of average pro-choicer. <br /><br />Your shell game is unconvincing. <br />JimmyJamesnoreply@blogger.com